Bad: yvettesbridalformal.com (Fig. 1) | Good: xinmsn.com (Fig. 4) | |
Visibility | - No distinct functions can be identified. - Links are not properly organized. - Links are cluttered and fighting to attract attention. |
- Functions can be easily identified. - Search box is prominent (since it is a search engine). - Sections are well categorized and organized (Fig. 5). - Tabs bar helps in organizing links. |
Consistency | - Fonts are differently sized. - Inconsistent colour scheme. |
- Headings and contents appropriately sized (headings larger than contents or details). - Font sizes are consistent. - Sections are well-aligned. - Tabs bar stays at the top of every page. |
Familiarity | - No proper metaphor for the page, links are just placed haphazardly. - Users have trouble finding what to look for and where to start. |
- Intuitive buttons. |
Affordance | - Unconventional design that confuses users. | - Conventional designs that make it easy for the user to navigate. - Layouts for different sections are consistent, so users can get used to it quickly. |
Navigation | - Easy to understand where some links lead to but usually not well executed (telling users where links lead to in long cumbersome sentences). - Destination of other links are ambiguous. - Website has no focus. |
- Search bars can be found at the top and the bottom of the page, so users who read to the bottom of a page will not have to scroll all the way back to the top to use it. - Tabs are highlighted for the sections being visited, so users know which page they are at and can navigate accordingly. |
Flexibility | - Gives user a choice of an “easier” navigation alternative, but it is not a huge improvement over the classic view. - No scrollbar in the alternate interface. |
- Users can select the home page for the country they reside in (Fig. 6). |
Style | - No central theme. - Supposed to be a bridal website but has many unrelated contents. - e.g. There is a link to an Apple Pie recipe on the homepage (Fig. 2). - e.g. More unrelated pictures of fishes further down the homepage (Fig. 3). |
- Color scheme is appealing. - Minimal variations of colour which makes outlook of the page easy on the eye. - Simple yet elegant design. |
Recovery | - No. Just no. - Horrible website. |
- Logo of the homepage appears in every section of the site, allowing user to return to the homepage from any location in the site. |
WARNING: The bad design may give you a shock or a heart attack... ~+**V8**+~
Fig. 1. Home page of Yvette's Bridal Formal |
Fig. 2. Random Apple Pie recipe |
Fig.3. Aww cute fishes... NOT |
Fig. 4. Homepage of xinmsn |
Fig. 5. Entertainment section of xinmsn |
Fig. 6. msn Worldwide for users to select their countries |
good comparison between the two examples! Would be useful if you have a list of what makes a good web design and what makes a bad one! nice examples(:
ReplyDelete